?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Wednesday February 1st 2012

Apple Denies Free Political Speech

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

Rejects Republican Candidate Ari David’s iPhone App

LOS ANGELES (YBH) – A few weeks ago I hired a company to create an iPhone application for my congressional campaign. My designers told me when we started that Apple would take about two weeks to approve the “app” after they finished the design and coding.

They submitted the app and then we waited and waited and waited.

Recently the designers contacted Apple to find out why the approval process was taking so long.

A couple of days ago Apple responded and told us that they were rejecting the submission, and that they were doing so on the grounds that content in the app is defamatory of my opponent, incumbent Henry Waxman.

Here are the statements that Apple found defamatory.

HENRY WAXMAN…

SUPPORTED Cap & Trade legislation that would have brought us $7 a gallon gas and as President Obama has stated would make electricity rates “necessarily sky rocket.” (This one is well known considering that Waxman sponsored the bill in the House and President Obama is famous for making the statement about the need under his plan for “skyrocketing” electricity rates).

VOTED TO CUT Medicare spending by a half a trillion dollars which would severely hurt seniors. Time to go Henry! (This one is also well known since the Health Care Reform bill just passed a few weeks ago).

VOTED AGAINST missile defense funding, which jeopardized the US and Israel (Waxman is famous for voting against missile defense program funding going all the way back to 1983 when Reagan first proposed the SDI system).

TRIED to make over-the-counter vitamins and supplements prescription only (On this one, Waxman’s original bill was defeated a few years ago but last week, lo and behold, Waxman inserted this language into the House version of the Financial Reform Bill AFTER IT HAD ALREADY PASSED!).

TRIED TO STRANGLE family farms with insane Soviet-Style regulation (Many people have not yet heard about this one so here is the documentation on it. My only problem with calling it “Soviet Style” is that even the Soviet’s would have been challenged to come up with something so stupid to do to our farming industry: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3878/pub_detail.asp).

As you can see not only are none of the statements defamatory, they are all factual.

By denying me this application Apple is now making an in-kind contribution to Henry Waxman by denying his competitor a modern tool for political communication. They are stifling my right to free political speech and they are carrying water for the Obama administration.

It is also relevant to note that Apple pulled all of their advertising from the Fox News channel: http://galiberal.com/?p=8939&cpage=1

Clearly people who work at Apple are likely to be the kind of creative people who may tend to vote Democrat and hold liberal views, but this goes far beyond that. This experience with Apple clearly shows that there is a political agenda going on within the culture of the company, and business decisions are subject to Apple’s political views.

If, as Apple claims, my statements about Henry Waxman are defamatory, it would be interesting to see what iPhone apps Apple has approved for Democrats in which negative statements about Republicans are made, and what standard Apple has held those statements to before approval.

Related posts:

  1. Blog of the Month: Things Apple is Worth More Than
  2. When Founders Leave: Lessons for Apple From Microsoft, Intel and Sun
  3. Apple founding contract fetches $1.5 million at auction
  4. Romney Denies Being Republican During Reagan Era (Video)
Ari David is a political consultant and a former candidate for Congress.

article archive.

Post Published: 18 May 2010
Found in section: Politics
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/themcgehee ak4mc

    I'd counter-boycott Apple, but I own nothing they make. I even refuse to install Quicktime plugins in my web browser.

  • DirtCrashr

    Waxman the moonbat marxist defames himself every time he sticks his head above ground and flaps his ears.

  • SSG Jeff (USAR)

    Happy to own an Android…

    • john

      Wow, you own an actual android? I thought androids and all other cybernetic organisms were at least 50 years off in the future.

  • JimInStL

    I just searched for "politics", "political", and "campaign" in the app store. No apps for or against any candidates.

    You can design a website that targets the iPhone and a "web app" doesn't need to go through Apple's approval.

  • Ron

    It's a shame Apple rejected the app. I own its wonderful products and the stock is one of the best to own. Politics should not be a factor in approving of apps but lots of developers are complaining about Apple's app approval process for various reasons. Denial based on context is not unusual for them. You'd have a case if Waxman had a competing app.

  • Yrral Dleifsarb

    Until I saw this, I was considering the purchase of an
    Apple computer, despite the company’s cult-like
    attributes and marketing approach. No more, as I
    cannot support the Dims’ system in good conscience.
    I do not mind doing business with folks who happen
    to be taken in by the Dims, as long as their business
    does not itself act as part of the corrupt Dim system.
    But Apple has crossed a bright line here.

    • raycote

      Political attack Apps !
      Up next the Glen Beck App.

      These are not Apps. They are propaganda from both the left and the right and can be delivered on a wide array of media without limit. Calling them Apps is just misrepresentation. He can put up his political free speech ads on twitter, facebook and many other media delivery system. There is a difference between a speech and an App.

      Other wise Apple would be swimming in an ocean of Glen Beck attack Apps from every Tom, Dick and Harry!

      Save those Apps for the Android platform where you are free to demand that your political free speech be elevated to Application ststus.

  • Javert

    I have not purchased an Apple product since they would not sell parts back in the original Apple and Lisa days.

    • raycote

      Stick with GOOGLE the little guys best friend!

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/jacksheet jacksheet

    Owning an Apple is like joining a cult.

    I refuse to participate in their closed architecture/code model. This app store incident is hardly surprising.

    Android phone/Zune MP3/PC laptops work fine for me.

    • raycote

      A new religion for radical Google freedom fighters is born.

      You're not in a cult though. You are a true believer!

  • Tommy from Chicago

    “I just searched for “politics”, “political”, and “campaign” in the app store. No apps for or against any candidates.” -JimInStL
    —————————-

    Not true. Look up “Obama” and you’ll see over 200+ Apps and remember during the election Apple had a ton of Pro-Obama/Democrat Apps. Then look up “Democrat”, “Liberal”, and other keywords and you’ll find a ton of other extremely politically biased apps.

  • Sophie

    There is at least one Tea Party finder app.

  • Guest

    Time to buy stock and submit shareholder proposals on free speech?

  • David H Dennis

    I created an app called ObamaIQ, which is a quiz game about Obama's life. It includes a few questions about the candidate that would generally create a negative, but accurate, impression of him.

    It was rejected for the same reasons as this app. I eventually removed enough of the questions to make it pass, but by then the 2008 election, and the interest in the app, was passed.

    You shouldn't get political information from the App Store, because it's heavily censored in this respect. Doesn't mean you shouldn't buy Apple products – after all, you can visit any web site you wish, with any political view you want, with their computers and i-devices.

    D

  • memememe

    Time to short.

  • fustian

    I chuckle at the poster that proudly claims he's got an android phone because THOSE guys aren't political.

  • Carl

    It's hard for me to get worked up over this. This is the Apple I've known since 1988. It's not so much that they are "liberal", quite the contrary; they are a controlling and totalitarian company and always have been. Will they open their hardware to cloners? No. Will they open their App Store? No. Will they open their iTunes? No. While they have incredibly innovative products, they have an incredibly reactionary approach for access to those products. I have never owned an Apple anything and refuse to install Apple anything on my computer. So, there is nothing I could personally do to hurt Apple worse than those robber-barons have already hurt themselves over the decades.

    • raycote

      Yes, unlike all those other democratically run corporations, because corporations as an institution are all about benevolent public works not private shareholder profits.

      GROW UP – you are just spouting a Google corporate party line.
      Apple or Google, a party line is a party line, so give it a break.

      Google does not share any of it's core revenue products either.

      • Julian

        Hilarious. Who mentioned google? You are telling people not to spout party lines yet it’s obvious you are an apple fanboy. This entire thread I’d funny – loads of rebplican and apple g
        fanboys talking utter rubbish.

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/selchietracker selchietracker

    I'm an old Unix guy, on the net since the DARPA days and /usr/group. I used to think Apple was one of the good guys, since Apple ][.

    No longer. You're in the same hole with MS now. Maybe worse.

    We don't forget.

  • NoDough

    Carl: "This is the Apple I've known since 1988. It's not so much that they are "liberal", quite the contrary; they are a controlling and totalitarian company and always have been."

    And how is "controlling and totalitarian" "contrary" to liberalism?

    • Carl

      It's a matter of position on the spectrum. The venacular is all screwed up at the moment. Liberalism would tend towards ideals such as personal liberty, free speech, civil rights, free trade, less government power, and the whole "you can't legislate morality" thing. What we are seeing from the historically "liberal" side of aisle is what I would define as Leftist ideology; authoritarianism, protectionism, totalitarianism, fascism, socialism, commumism and all the other Euroisms that are so en vogue at the moment.

      • Vas Sudanagunta

        Dude, Apple is a private enterprise, not a government. I think you're a little confused.

  • The Doctor

    An iPhone app? Seriously?

    Who cares?

  • The App Guy

    This is a bit like complaining your free speech has been violated because The Washington Post won't let you write a column. It's a closed system. There are other avenues for your speech. You're an idiot.

    • TC Simons

      App Guy, spoken like a true Obama statist! All hail the king!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/empireofno MODERN1ST

    why are you whining? doesn't apple have a right to sell what it wants? isn't that the free market you say you want?

    maybe you should grow a pair of balls and just suck it up.

    • darf needleman

      You are okay then if Apple also wants to not sell to blacks and gays? Should blacks just "suck it up"? Not sure if these two issues are on par, but if you follow your logic it applies

      • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/londonamerican MODERN1ST

        There's no comparison. Apple's not saying they won't sell devices or software TO anybody. They are saying they won't sell defamatory software. It's about what they won't sell, not who they are selling to.

        So, yeah – suck it up like a good free-market ideologue. Nobody can force Apple to sell software that violates their developer's agreement, which is a private contract between Apple and people who use Apple's App Store to sell software on Apple-branded devices. Arguing your "rights" to violate that contract and to appropriate Apple's property to push your ideology sounds like "socialism" except that it's not nearly so principled.

  • ebc

    it's clear you are crazy

    nice link bait in the title
    you can't even spell iPhone

    enjoy wasting your time running against waxman

    • darf needleman

      yes, all hail the Democrats. Why even hold elections?

      ebc, where is iPhone misspelled?

  • Colin

    How about creating an Android app, instead, or you could create a mobile browser optimized website with HTML5?

  • http://twitter.com/klandwehr @klandwehr

    No offense, but your time would have been better spent promoting your candidate thru social media and building a better Web site, that can be used on all platform and updated daily , then trying to create an application that only a few people are going to use. Plus as others have said, Apple a private company they can reject any app they want

  • Jim

    Amusing that a Republican thinks that he should be able to dictate what a company does. Don’t republicans usually fight for minimal restrictions and regulations on businesses? What makes Apple an exception?

  • Buba

    Not defamatory? Yea right.
    Glad Apple is making sure the store is not flooded with junk. This is what the app is really.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/ma_ten ma_ten

    Mr. David, you are hilarious. You write "STRANGLE family farms with insane Soviet-Style regulation", then 4 lines down you say "none of the statements defamatory, they are all factual." For a moment I thought you were being serious. Good one! Of course the idea that you are personally & specifically targeted to have your Free Speech Rights taken away is *almost* as funny.

  • Ken Jackson

    First they came for Adobe, but I said nothing, because I was not Adobe…

    Too little too late. Where was your outrage when people would've cared.

  • Ryan

    It's no loger political speech when you package it and sell it at a store, it's commercial speech, which is not protected by the first amendment. Besides, a commercial entity isn't what the first amendment covers anyway. It's to prevent government censorship.

    Seriously, the fact that you don't know that frightens me. Thank God I don't live in California and have to choose between you and Waxman.

  • The ORG

    Every heard of the web Mr David

    A politician, making a crisis out of a drama, for their own gain, never.

  • Mr. Indie-Pendent

    You are coo-coo for coacoa puffs. Glad Apple is keeping garbage like yours out. Seriously, how did you think this was money well spent? Are you only trying to reach voters w/iPhones? Freaking moron. Invest in the Web. The Web is your friend. If this is how you decide to spend your money, voters should look elsewhere for a good candidate because your decision skills are seriously lacking.

  • eidooc

    sounds like YOU got suckered in by your developers DOOD. Any developer that’s familiar with Apple’s App Store approval process would have informed you of the possibility of your app not getting approved (for whatever reason) and would have SUGGESTED a WEB app approach to reach as many mobile users possible anyway.

  • wiltjk

    I would think that if the app were about the candidate, events, timelines, etc. and nothing about the opponent (whether factual or otherwise), it would have a much better chance for approval.

    As stated in this post, it is obvious that normal politics are at play using every opportunity to detract your opponent and promote yourself.

    All in all, a good call by Apple.

  • DLG

    I never realized that private companies were mandated to sell or distribute political messages. Sounds like Republicans aren't so concerned about government interference when they are the ones who feel wronged. Hurrah for hypocrisy!

  • Vas Sudanagunta

    You're running for government office and yet you, Mr. David, don't even know what the right of "free speech" is! The constitutionally enshrined right of free speech protects you from any *government* curtailment of your speech. It does not require any private party to grant you any freedom of speech on a medium owned by that private channel.

    It's especially ironic that you make this claim since you are a Republican — presumably like other Republicans you give supremacy to private property rights. If the Tea Party had any consistency, they'd show up on this page and brand you a Socialist!

  • Roy

    This sounds like free market at work. You should be proud.

  • ksj

    If there are IPhone apps that support other candidates then they pretty much have to let them all in. There are federal election laws that regulate this. Like it or not, Apple is now a publisher and can be regulated as such in the context of election law.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/EPorvaznik EPorvaznik

    Ahhhh, 1984 Big Brother ad now firmly on the other foot. However, Ari, as others have mentioned, it is their business, regardless of how flimsy and hypocritical their reasoning. Screw 'em and build a better and different mousetrap.