?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Wednesday February 8th 2012

N.Y.’s Bloomberg Squeaks Into Third Term

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

NEW YORK (YBH.ME) – Declaring himself to be neither Republican nor Democrat, billionaire Mike Bloomberg narrowly defeated lackluster Democrat Bill Thompson, spending an estimated $100 million of his own money to snag a third term.

Bloomberg changes rules and wins a third term.

Bloomberg changes rules and wins a third term.

Since 1905, there have been 3 other 12 year New York city mayors.  Bloomberg joins the short list of Fiorello LaGuardia, Ed Koch and Robert F. Wagner.  No term limits were in place during the tenure of LaGuardia, Koch and Wagner.

Term limits imposed by referendum in 1993 and cemented in 1996 were rolled back by a special City Council vote in October 2008.  Two thirds of those voting to allow the mayor a third term thereby made themselves eligible to run for an extra term.  A motley collection of opponents on the left and right cried foul, to no avail.

At the time, Bloomberg stated, “The question for me has become much less about the theoretical and much more about the practical. And so to put it in very practical terms, handling this financial crisis while strengthening the central services such as education and public safety is a challenge I want to take on for the people of New York.”

Or, as Louis XIV said “L’etat, c’est moi.”

Lacking a strong opponent to point out, for example, his sweetheart union deals, Bloomberg is without, as one blogger put it “safeguards to limit the power of individuals and protects governments from corruption. . . ensuring a continual debate of ideas and not personalities.”

In 1993 and 1996, voter referendums imposed term limits on those seeking to serve as mayor of New York,  allowing a candidate  no more than two 4 year terms.

It may not be smooth sailing for the Mayor.  The Thompson campaign spent only $10 million, yet still came within roughly 50,000 votes of unseating Bloomberg.  The close election shows that many New Yorkers may have been uncomfortable with Mr. Bloomberg and the city council changing the rules to suit their own needs.

Related posts:

  1. Occupy This a href= http www bloomberg com…
  2. Occupy Elsewhere: Judge Rules Agaist OWS, Backs Bloomberg and Zuccotti Landlord
  3. Hot Air: Breaking: SCOTUS to review ObamaCare, individual mandate this term.
  4. World’s Smallest Violin: Michael Moore Calls Obama’s First Term ‘Heartbreaking,’ a ‘Disappointment’.
Laura spent years as a Hollywood story analyst, did a big 180, and is now an entrepreneur focused on web marketing and analytics. She's also a mom of one.

article archive.

Post Published: 04 November 2009
Found in section: News and Analysis
  • Mary Gorges

    I am a supporter of M. Bloomberg. who I feel has done an excellent job of managing a complex,multi-ideological city. However,in unilaterally overturning the two-term limit (which I personally oppose) ) his lack of faith in those whose first concern is the city, not politics, is demonstrative of an ego and not of the city, which he claims to love. I do believe that Michael Bloomberg is the right mayor for this financially troubled time, but I DO NOT believe that Bloomberg had the authority/right to usurp the democratic will of the people. Mike, if you really believed in yourself, you should have believed in us.

    • John Kantor

      you are very wrong. Mike is not good.

  • Alex Chionisky

    Mike bloomberg sucks soooo bad that i want to puke all over his crap-covered face and kick him in his invisible balls. And for all of the Bloomberg fans out there, GET A LIFE!!!!! or a least vote for someone good. I really hope Bloomberg sees this because this is what he deserves.

    • Rex Frone

      i agree with u.