?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Wednesday February 1st 2012

Taxpayer Subsidized Cellphone Program Set to Expand

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

LOS ANGELES (YBH) – A Mexico-based wireless company, known in America as Tracfone, is currently the major provider of a U.S. government-subsidized program called SafeLink.  SafeLink provides free wireless service to the poor.  Tracfone is owned by billionaire Carlos Slim’s America Movil.

According to Safelink’s website, “SafeLink Wireless is a government-supported program that provides a free cell phone and airtime each month for income-eligible customers.”

Free cell service for the poor a hit with users.

Free cell service for the poor a hit with users.

The service provides a free cellphone and 60-70 free minutes to qualified recipients in Alabama, Connecticut, D.C., Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.  Users can purchase extra minutes from Tracfone’s website.  Rates for extra minutes start at $9.99 for 30 minutes.  The rate of $0.33 per minute is typical for cell phone users who go over their monthly contracted allotment.  Traditional domestic calling cards usually carry a much lower rate, and have been a primary choice for low income phone needs.

Since 1984, via Congressional mandate, “Lifeline” telephone service has been offered to low income Americans. This phone service is paid for by telecommunications companies, which generally recover the cost by charging paying clients a “Universal Service” fee.

According to the FCC website, “This line item appears when a company chooses to recover its USF contributions directly from its customers by billing them this charge. The FCC does not require this charge to be passed on to customers. Each company makes a business decision about whether and how to assess charges to recover its Universal Service costs.”  Almost all U.S.-based telecom companies pass this fee along to customers, however.

Lifeline service is available to any family earning  less than 135 per cent of Federal poverty guidelines, or if they are a participant in any of the following programs: Medicaid, Food Stamps, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Federal Public Housing Assistance (Section 8), Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), or The National School Lunch Program’s Free Lunch Program.

Tracfone director of government relations  Jose Fuentes has stated, “Having a telephone service, just in general, is not a privilege, it should be a right . . .everyone should be in contact, everybody should have the opportunity to get a phone call, especially if it’s an employer.”

A New York Times article this past summer featured grateful free cellphone recipients, among them a disabled retiree who already personally pays $159 a month for a land line, cable and high speed internet access for his home.  As a recipient of government assistance, he qualifies for a free cell phone, despite earning $1,600 a month take home pay.

Tracfone  is anxious to expand beyond the mostly eastern states that have signed onto the program so far.  Public Utility Commissions in the remaining states have expressed caution about signing on to the program, especially whether it satisfies the core mandate of a lifeline phone – reliability in an emergency.   In California, ATT, T-Mobile and Sprint have all petitioned the PUC for permission to offer the service.

Telecom carriers are eligible for up to $10 per month from the government for each cell phone issued. under the program.   As of July,  over 1.4 million “Lifeline” cell phones have been issued.

Related posts:

  1. Indiana Voucher Program Likely To Be Upheld, Judge Denies Block
  2. Green Program Leverages Power of Sports Fans
  3. STOP MAKING SENSE: Obama opposes repeal of healthcare program suspended last week.
  4. BART Website Still Down After ‘Anonymous’ Hack
John Romano is the publisher and editor of Yes, But However!, a musician, a former political correspondent for BBC Radio London, and a serial web entrepreneur. Follow him on twitter: twitter.com/yesbuthowever or John Romano on Google+

article archive.

Post Published: 23 October 2009
Found in section: News and Analysis
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/AlisonG AlisonG

    I think that this is a great service to the community and just the sort of thing that will help the unemployed to get a job and those in need to be able to dial 911 if they need to. I think the states that don't have this Safelink program yet should get it because all Americans are entitled to a telephone and payphone are becoming the dinosaurs of telecommunications, they are dieing out.

    • Gerald

      When the country was not in debt up to its ears, people had a phone if they could afford one. Taking money from one person to pay for another person phone is communist. It is your thinking that will destroy America.

      • Carol

        Gerald, you're a moron.

    • ben

      hate to break it to you but you are not entitled to a telephone. you are not entitled to foodstamps. you are not entitled to free healthcare. the U.S. constitution garuantees none of these 'entitlements'. taking my tax dollars and applying 60% of them to 'social programs'(safelink,ect.) is thievery when i can hardly pay my own phone bill. the only thing you are entitled to is getting up and helping yourself today. if you want to help people,give them your money, don't steal mine.

  • Smitty

    Entitled… there is the word of the day. Everyone thinks they are entitled.

  • guest

    perhaps stricter guidelines should be implemented; however, as a disabled person receiving $673 per month and $71 in food stamps…….this is a god send!

  • theunderboss26

    i actually get 158 in stamps but i had to do magic …lol

  • theunderboss26

    its the maor companies that are payin the major taxes so there really footin the bill …lol go BP.

  • whits

    I think there are many very responsible users of these phones, but I know many who are not responsible with the minutes. My experience is that the mailbox is either not set up or is full so an employer would likely not be able to reach the person. I share a cell phone (not subsidized) with my husband as I can not rational the expense to have one myself. These people have nationwide calling and texting on the plans and this being an older article, the number of minutes has also been increased in some states. It seems excessive.

  • http://www.panoramio.com/user/5699600 man with van london

    I am getting a fatal error when i try to create a brand new web page on WP. I think it has something to do with the new WP update. Is anybody else having a equivalent difficulty? Know how it could be fixed??!?? Cheers.

  • Ken

    Why subsidize CELL PHONES? Why not HOME PHONE (land lines) which are a lot cheaper!!???????

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/FT365YVA4FUCBO2FIO7TGQ3EGM Shotaiken

    No, everyone thinks they are NOT entitled. Truth is: Everyone is entitled. They think they are entitled to have things. To not share. To have things shared with them. To not pay taxes. To receive help when they need/want it. We’re all entitled, but we all think we’re not.

    We’re a selfish stupid species.