?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Wednesday February 1st 2012

New Afghanistan Rules Of Engagement May Hamstring U.S. Troops

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

WASHINGTON, D.C. (YBH.ME) – Tom Bowman and Renee Montagne of NPR’s Morning Edition, hardly a conservative military think tank, highlighted the frustration American forces are facing under General Stanley McChrystal’s new rules of engagement in Afghanistan on yesterday’s show.

McChrystal's new rules of engagement test soldiers in Afghanistan

McChrystal's new rules of engagement test soldiers in Afghanistan

The Pentagon is employing a strategy of minimizing civilian casualties in an effort to win over the civilian population in Afghanistan while dealing with dangerous insurgents at the same time.  This strategy, while potentially effective when it works, has led to frustration among U.S. troops.

During the segment, Mr. Bowman discusses a recent incident he witnessed first hand, in the Helmand River Valley in Afghanistan.

BOWMAN: Well, Renee, we were in this combat outpost down in southern Afghanistan, in the Helmand River Valley, and we were inside this center, a command center, watching a video screen. They were watching live while these guys were digging a hole for a roadside bomb. And there were other indicators, too, besides digging the hole. There was a guy swimming across a canal with this wire, and the wires are used to detonate the bomb… There were a couple of guys keeping watch and stopping traffic. And the Marines were intercepting a radio call from these suspected insurgents while they were doing these other activities.

MONTAGNE: And on the radio, they were saying we’re planting a bomb?

BOWMAN: And on the radio they were talking about planting a bomb.

MONTAGNE: So from the Marines perspective, the Afghans really did appear to be insurgents. So what did they do?

What the Marines did was let the insurgents flee, based on the new restrictive rules of engagement put in place to deter civilian casualties, it was the only thing they could do.

Mr. Bowman talked to a Marine named Lt. James Wendy after the incident.  Mr. Wendy assured NPR that no one besides the enemy intent on killing American soldiers would have been hurt in the altercation.  Asked why the Marines weren’t allowed to take action Mr. Wendy replied, “Honestly, I don’t know. I’d like to say I wish we could play by the big boy rules, you know, but, you know, it’s just the way it is.”  Mr. Wendy went on to respectfully express frustration with Gen. McChrystal’s new policy.

NPR also contacted General McChrystal for the feature.  Gen. McChrystal stated, “I’ve been at this a long time now, since 9/11, and there were a tremendous number of times when I’ve seen activities done, which, on the surface of what was seen, looks exactly one way, looks completely convincing. And then in the aftermath, what you saw was incomplete. In fact, what we find is civilian casualties who are unarmed civilians.”

Seemingly, General McChrystal understood the frustration of the soldier’s serving under him, he continued, “I think when we err on the side of maturity and caution, there is a cost. And I know that we’re asking an extraordinary amount from them to operate with such restraint and self-discipline, but I think it’s how we win the war.”

Critics of the new rules of engagement are sure to point out the similarities to the Byzantine rules U.S. servicemen faced in Viet Nam toward the end of that conflict.

Tom Bowman is a former Baltimore Sun reporter and currently serves as NPR’s Pentagon correspondent.

Related posts:

  1. Afghanistan: Motorcycle Bomb Explodes In Vegetable Market
  2. Appeals court rules against Obama healthcare law
  3. Your Tax Dollars At Work: U.S. Military Loses $360 Million To Afghanistan Insurgents, Criminals
John Romano is the publisher and editor of Yes, But However!, a musician, a former political correspondent for BBC Radio London, and a serial web entrepreneur. Follow him on twitter: twitter.com/yesbuthowever or John Romano on Google+

article archive.

Post Published: 12 December 2009
Found in section: News and Analysis
  • J.D. Sly

    When our troops are saddled with these R.O.E.'s , the tragic outcome is that it hands the advantage to the enemy. Our soldiers and their commanders on the ground should be given plenty of leeway to use their best judgement in each situation, and the appropriate action to take. Vietnam should have provided us with hard lesson of what happens when those that sit behind a desk try to micro-manage a war. Unfortunately, our politicians and certain generals did not learn from Vietnam and now we find ourselves bogged down in another (nearly) dtroops can return ecade long war. This should not be the case with the most powerful military in the world!

  • wayne k.

    if we'd fought the second world war under these rules of engagement, we'd all be speaking german or japanese.

  • ARTHUR SHANTZ

    THERE IS A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TRUTH TO THE SAW THAT RESTRICTIVE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT INHIBITED THE PROSECUTION OF OUR WAR IN VIETNAM.

    THE BIGGEST FAILING WAS THAT NEITHER MR JOHNSON NOR MR NIXON WENT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND EXPLAINED WHAT WAS AT STAKE.

    NOT LEAST, TOO MANY CONSERVATIVES WERE UNWILLING TO SUPPORT A PROTRACTED FIGHT. MR NIXON'S "SILENT MAJORITY" REMAINED SILENT AND FAILED TO DEMAND VICTORY.

    WHEN I LEFT VIETNAM IN NOVEMBER 1970 WE WERE BEATING THE GUERILLAS AT THEIR OWN GAME AND HAD THEM ON THE ROPES. BEATING AN ENEMY ONE AMBUSH AT A TIME DOES NOT TRANSLATE INTO SOUND BITES THE WAY COFFINS COMING OFF A PLANE ONE AT A TIME DOES.

    CONSERVATIVES AND OTHER PATRIOTIC AMERICANS NEED TO SUPPORT GENERAL MCCHRYSTAL AND EVEN MR OBAMA ON THIS ONE.

    WHAT PART OF NUCLEAR ARMED TERRORISTS DOESN'T EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND?

  • Ron Piretti

    6/29/2010

    “The Rules Of Engagement”
    Obama, Americas President has really gone to extraordinary lengths to protect the Muslim population in Afghanistan with this rule for the American troops. I am not completely versed on all the rules of engagement, but I do know our troops in Afghanistan can’t shoot at anyone carrying a weapon unless they are shot at first. I believe that once he/she has been shot at they (our troops) must then get permission to fire back from a Muslim person attached to our troops, their purpose being determining if the person/persons are civilians or insurgents. I think I got that right. How would Obama like it if one of our troops was one of his daughters. Again I tell you stop listening to what he says and watch what he does. This is a clear indication of Obama’s Muslims lives being more important than American Lives.
    These rules were imposed by the Pentagon and not by General McChrystal as you will read just below McChrystal’s picture. Obama is a Muslim, and watching what he does continually points to it.
    Our troops are dying in two ways
    1.Saving Afghanistan and it’s people
    2. The Rules of engagement