?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Saturday February 4th 2012

Obama Adviser Says She Was Misunderstood

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

NEW YORK (YBH.ME) – An Obama adviser, Dalia Mogahed, appeared via telephone on a British television show earlier this month where she stated that “the portrayal of Sharia [law] has been oversimplified in many cases” and “I think the reason so many women support Sharia is because they have a very different understanding of Sharia than the common perception in Western media.”  The quotes taken on their own have caused a bit of a firestorm on the internet.

Dalia Mogahed misunderstood by U.S Conservatives and hardline Islam?

Dalia Mogahed misunderstood by U.S Conservatives and hardline Islam?

The remarks came during a broadcast of  “Muslimah Dilemma”, a London-based TV talk and discussion show.  The show is hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the controversial Hizb ut Tahrir party in the UK. Members of the group believe in destroying the West, and democracy in general, via non-violent means and establishing Sharia law across the globe. During the show on October 8, the host and another guest took aim at “man-made law” and the West’s  “lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism.”  Ms. Mogahed did not refute the arguments made by the other participants during the program.

Ms. Mogahed later wrote about her experience on the show for the Huffington Post:

To my unpleasant surprise, I found out on air that I was joined by a member of Hizbul Tahrir (HT), a marginal but controversial group which denounces Western Democracy and calls for the creation of a pan-Islamic state in the Muslim world. The reaction to my reporting of Gallup’s findings on Muslim views of democracy, gender and Shari’a (Islam’s ethical and legal code) by both the HT representative and later the bloggers who’ve parsed my interview showed just how little either side was willing to understand the very people they so prolifically discuss.

Ms. Mogahed continued:

The HT representative on the program dismissed or “reinterpreted” findings I presented so as to not challenge the group’s simplistic utopian ideology which holds liberty in contempt as morally decadent. For example, as I regularly report, our research shows that far from denouncing democracy, Muslims around the world say it is among the things they most admire about the West.

She also had some choice words for the right-wing blogosphere who took issue with her statements:

As much as HT selectively ignored and exploited these findings to push their propaganda, many conservative pundits who diametrically oppose HT’s vision of the world, did much the same. To them, my crime was that I reported that many Muslim women wanted Sharia as a source of legislation. I also explained that Muslim women surveyed by Gallup said they believed they should have access to equal legal rights, free employment, voting without family influence, and even leadership positions in government. This suggests that many Muslim women see Sharia differently from those who use it to deny women rights. For simply stating results of survey research, I stood accused of “endorsing” Taliban-like rule, and downplaying the abuses done in the name of sharia.

After the interview she told the Washington Post that “I don’t regret anything I said.  My regret is that I went on the show.” It is unclear how or if Ms. Mogahed was misled by the shows representatives before her appearance.  During the show Ms. Mogahed repeatedly quoted research she had undertaken for Gallup.  At no time is their a statement that “[p]romotes Sharia” as one blogger stated she did.

Ms. Mogahed was appointed to President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships in April of 2009.  In an interview with Egypt’s Al Masry al Youm in mid-April, Ms. Mogahed declared her allegiance to the United States above all else, disappointing some in the Arab world.

Ms. Mogahed is also the Executive Director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies.  Born in Egypt, she came to the United States with her parents 30 years ago.  She holds a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Pittsburgh.

The entire show can be streamed on YouTube.

Related posts:

  1. Barack Obama the Apostate
  2. Rush Limbaugh’s Osama Obama Problem
  3. Axelrod’s Hail Mary (Hint: It Isn’t Calling Barack Obama “AA+”)
  4. Romano: If Romney Wins GOP Nomination, I’m Voting for Obama
John Romano is the publisher and editor of Yes, But However!, a musician, a former political correspondent for BBC Radio London, and a serial web entrepreneur. Follow him on twitter: twitter.com/yesbuthowever or John Romano on Google+

article archive.

Post Published: 28 October 2009
Found in section: News and Analysis, Politics
  • http://www.ztruth.com Brandi

    Magehed said she thought that the West's view of Sharia Law differed from Muslim women who want it was because of the perception given by the western media (4.20 in the video). She implied western media was not given out accurate information on Sharia Law and from that context she appeared promoting Sharia law. She went on to say Muslim woman like some Western values but then gave her personal opinion that these values were not really considered strictly western values but rather universal values and the West simply adopted them. Then goes on to talk about what Muslims least like about the West.

    Islam Channel, the station this show aired, is an "Islamist" TV outlet run by CEO Mohammed Ali Harrath, a convicted terrorist who is wanted by Interpol!

    Ms Mogahed claims she was mislead is a poor excuse for her responsibility for finding out whom she is speaking with and to.

    Ms. Mogahed was also scheduled to be a keynote speaker for CAIR's annual banquet until this all blew up. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas terror funding trial and is an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas infrastructure in America.

  • http://www.realcourage.org Jeffrey Imm

    Hizb ut-Tahrir had a convention in Chicago in July promoting supremacism, denouncing liberty, denouncing equality, denouncing democracy, and handing out pamphlets calling for the DEATH PENALTY for those who leave Islam as "traitors." At the Chicago convention, women were ordered to sit in the back. Hizb ut-Tahrir seeks to create a global Islamic supremacist caliphate. Why is ANYONE advising the White House still doing so after appearing with such a group? What is the difference in appearing with the supremacist Hizb ut-Tahrir any different than appearing with the supremacist Ku Klux Klan or Black Panthers?

  • Tim David

    Great point Jeff. The reverse would have led to another white houser’ leaving in shame.