?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Thursday February 2nd 2012

San Jose Cops Will Wear Body Cameras

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

LOS ANGELES (YBH.ME) – San Jose knows the way.  .  . to get it all on camera.  18 helmet cameras are being put into  use in San Jose in a test program aimed at reducing escalating violence in arrests and general public interactions.  The department has been under fire for a number of alleged abuses of force. Patrol officers in the experiment  will be turning on the cameras every time they talk with anyone.  The cameras look a lot like bluetooth earpieces, and are attached via headband.  A mini computer rides on the officer’s belt.  Every shift will end with a data download.

San Jose Cop Sports Real Time Camera Recording Gear

San Jose Cop Sports Real Time Camera Recording Gear

Arizona-based, publicly traded,  Taser International is footing the initial cost for the experiment.  The gear rings up at $1,700 per cop, plus a $99 per monthly fee per officer.  That’s a heavy outlay if every officer has the equipment, but lawsuit payouts for wrongful death, incarceration or injury aren’t cheap either. 

“The AXON project is unfortunately a positive thing right now because the level of distrust is so high,” said Raj Jayadev, head of a San Jose community organization.   San Jose and the surrounding Santa Clara valley is a melting pot of Asian (especially Vietnamese), Latino, and Asian Indian populations,  sustained by the odd economic mix of high tech and agribusiness. Activists point to Department of Justice statistics which show that, for example, in a city where Latinos account for roughly 30 percent of the population, they represented 57 percent of the public intoxication arrests in 2007.  Charges of resisting arrest are also very high in the city.

The so-called “Bobbie Cam”  has been in selective use in the United Kingdom since 2007, where it is claimed that violent crime has been reduced by 8 per cent, and incidents of excessive officer force are at zero.  They are particularly used in answering domestic violence calls.

The American Civil Liberties Union has come out strongly against police cameras, seeing them as a violation of the Fourth Amendment right to privacy, but courts have held that citizens have little expectation  of privacy in public spaces.  Disclosure that a citizen is being recorded is required of all body camera-wearing officers.


Related posts:

  1. (Video) Republican Congressman has Police Seize Cameras in Audience
  2. End of an Era: Major manufacturers cease production of movie film cameras.
  3. So they are still of some use: Obama bumper sticker led cops to shooting suspect.
  4. Police believe New York body is Craigslist prostitute
Laura spent years as a Hollywood story analyst, did a big 180, and is now an entrepreneur focused on web marketing and analytics. She's also a mom of one.

article archive.

Post Published: 20 December 2009
Found in section: News and Analysis
  • Dermot Jones

    This is a good thing for the law abiding citizen, it give no run for misconduct of those rogue officers.
    Bring it on California wide.

  • ZBM

    I completely support the concept, but have reservations. The article says the officer will be responsible for turning on the camera at the beginning of an interaction. Will there be significant consequences for failing to do so?

    If not, then this is no different than dash-cam footage being erased after a particularly questionable incident.

    On privacy grounds, the ACLU should back off. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in an encounter with law enforcement; beyond that, the good that could result from mandatory recording of all encounters far outweighs the risks to our constitutional rights and privileges.

  • Alan

    It's there to protect the officer not the suspect.You can beat the rap but not the ride.If it can be turned off by the officer then it's under his control while a cam in a car cannot if something goes down.If everbody is being recorded 24/7 by the government then they can find a law that you break everday! It's Totalitarianism and it's only going to get worst with CCTV cameras with face reconization, Biometrics and implant chips.They all are coming to give the 24/7 surveillance to our new digital masters.