Secondly, people born into freedom (like most west) have started to take their freedoms for granted. The thinking that a majority should be able to gang up on the minority is fraught with danger and ultimately oppressive societies, against which the founders of democratic/secular political order fought and brought about the political system under which we live…alas people are no longer aware of the true reasons and beauties of secular and tolerant system.
For the proponents of this ban, I suggest reading up on the philosophical underpinnings of the political system and western society before you attempt to explain this ban as a means to "protect" western society. You may be surprised to learn the reasons why the Laws evolved to espouse the freedom of religion and expression and why the good Laws are "generic" and not "specific" – just imagine what you'd need to do to this law to make it truly generic and the possibilities will startle you. I warn you to not simply ignore those possibilities simply because you see them as unlikely as you are in the majority, since everyone is in a minority at some stage.

I live in Brooklyn near a Muslim school, so I observe plenty of second generation kids in a non-Muslim country. Naturally, their culture is watered down when they can come to our country and do what they want. They can’t keep their kids from watching Spongebob. Their culture is being eroded by new media just like yours.

If we want these people to play it cool in the future, we have to expose our ideological selves to them, because that is the behavior of people who know they’re right. This doesn’t mean that we don’t take actual security threats seriously. There will always be nutjobs with bombs, but we can’t expect radicals to chill while they’re made to feel like second-class citizens. MY ATTITUDE IS DIFFERENT FROM APPEASEMENT, I feel it is something like a natural courtesy among earthlings.