?

Leaning right, leaning left, YBH!
Wednesday February 1st 2012

Quick Hit: The Question Sean Hannity Didn’t Ask Michael Moore

Share in an emailShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Stumble UponShare on RedditShare on DiggSubscribe to Yes, But, However!Print this articleybh spacer

I’m always amazed when I watch two pundits or political enemies spar on TV and an opening for an easy left hook comes up and an anchor or guest pulls their punch.

Michael Moore on Sean Hannity.

Michael Moore on Sean Hannity.

This happened on FOX’s “Hannity” last night.  Mr. Hannity and Mr. Moore were discussing Moore’s new film “Capitalism: A Love Story” when the following exchange occurred:

HANNITY: Well, let me give you an example. You — if you went to Cuba — and we’ll get into this in a minute.

MOORE: Yes.

HANNITY: Do you think Fidel Castro would allow you to produce a movie and millions of dollars trashing his system?

MOORE: Well, I don’t know, that’s a good question.

HANNITY: You’d be killed.

MOORE: Oh, I don’t think so. Oh, come on. Are you still following that line?

A natural follow-up would have been “Oh yeah, then why hasn’t anyone in Cuba made such a movie.”   When Moore started to obfuscate, Mr. Hannity could have persistently asked the question in different ways until he got an answer.

Hannity instead went in a different direction with the following:

HANNITY: It’s not a line. I had a friend of mine whose family was killed by Castro when he came to power.

MOORE: When he came — oh, so what are we now, 40 years ago?

HANNITY: OK, 40 years ago, he’s still a murderer.

Moore then turned the tables on Sean Hannity and talked about the “murders” that the United States has committed over the last ten years.  I’ll leave aside that Michael Moore seems to think crimes committed by Castro 40 years ago have no significance or aren’t worth discussing.

I can understand why Sean Hannity followed up with the statement he did, but it let Mr. Moore off the hook.

I would still like an answer from Mr. Moore to the following questions:

Who are the Cuban filmmakers chronicling dissent within Cuba?  If they don’t exist why not?

Overall, I’d recommend watching the entire interview on FOX.com .  Both Moore and Hannity did a good job of pointing out some weakness in the other’s arguments.  Moore landed a few blows about Wall Street corruption and Hannity couldn’t get Moore to admit that most people in foreclosure had any responsibility whatsoever for there own mortgage mess.  None.  Mr. Moore pretty much blames the entire mortgage crisis on tricky lenders.

I’ve emailed Mr. Moore the questions.  If I hear back I’ll update this post.

Related posts:

  1. We the Rich: Michael Moore deplores Wall Street greed:
  2. World’s Smallest Violin: Michael Moore Calls Obama’s First Term ‘Heartbreaking,’ a ‘Disappointment’.
  3. RICH MAN, POOR MAN, YOU’RE NOT FOOLING ANYONE, MAN!: MICHAEL MOORE: I’m Not Part Of The 1%!
  4. Tech question of the day WSJ Can…
John Romano is the publisher and editor of Yes, But However!, a musician, a former political correspondent for BBC Radio London, and a serial web entrepreneur. Follow him on twitter: twitter.com/yesbuthowever or John Romano on Google+

article archive.

Post Published: 07 October 2009
Found in section: News and Analysis, Opinion
  • chad

    Quote:
    "Who are the Cuban filmmakers chronicling dissent within Cuba? If they don’t exist why not?"
    answer:
    Who cares??
    Why discuss cuba when the film and every subject is about the problems in the United states?
    Did Moore ever say that Cuba was a better country than the US>?
    I know he pointed out how much better Cuban healthcare is than americas healthcare system, but other than that, why the Cuba reference when we do not live in Cuba and the film is not about Cuba??

    • Tom

      Well, if capitalism is wrong and we should become a communist or socialist country, then we would lose the very freedoms that gave Mr. Moore the ability to make his movie.

      The point he is making here is, that there are no Cuban film makers dissenting because they would be murdered by their own gov't. However, Moore seems to think Cuba has a better system of gov't.

      I don't know how to better connect the dots for you.

      • Greg

        If capitalism is wrong it does not mean we are gonna become a communist or a socialist country where are freedoms are taken away. But it seems you gave up your freedom of thought long time ago.

  • Jim Becker

    chad as a moore apologist i can see your point. i think the author is pointing out the sheer hypocrisy of michael moore mere existence.

    how about democrat franklin raines who took fannie and freddy to the cleaners. moore skips over him because he is a good democrat, and good democrats are beyond reproach, right chad boy.

  • Jose

    That was a great debate. They both gave a spirited debate and kept it friendly. That is what America is about. I really believe that Sean made the best point that M. Moore is trashing the system that he used to be successful. Capatilism brings prosperity. Socialism brings more poverty and keeps people down. China has figured this out. Even though they are communist they have discovered the secret of capitalism and that is why they're country is economically speeding up, unlike ours in America and Europe.

    • Rob

      Jose,

      As Chinese and American business interests use or exploit human resources there (because it's cheaper and the profit margins are higher), I can assure you it negatively impacts our resources to compete and thusly creating more hardships here….this without the mention of Socialism. Socialism isn't the answer, I know…but a level capitalistic playing field is. The free market, internationally, is not free or fair.